I keep thinking about – and hearing about – expansion for the National Women’s Soccer League, and I can’t get over the circular nature of the conversation. Expansion was the topic of the very first feature this website published in 2009; I’m not entirely exempt from my own criticism of how the topic has been covered.
Expansion has long been viewed as some sort of golden ticket to stability for the NWSL, but the league remains equally focused on strengthening the current nine teams as much as adding new groups. Since the Orlando Pride’s entry into the league beginning with the 2016 season, there has not been NWSL expansion without contraction. The Boston Breakers and FC Kansas City each folded in the 2017-18 offseason, and the Utah Royals joined as effectively a relocated FC Kansas City franchise – an ‘expansion team’ for legal reasons, apparently.
That defining offseason is a reminder that expansion, in a vacuum, lacks context. For as much as there are interested markets – a loosely defined long list of a dozen or so, with a handful that are serious – there are more pressing matters within the current group of owners. And finding solutions – from venue changes, to more investment by some owners – will become increasingly important when U.S. Soccer’s operating agreement for the league ends later this year, and owners assume more direct decision-making power.
The entire article is accessible only to members of The Equalizer Extra. Already a member? Awesome! Please sign in below. If not, you can sign up below.
Your accountSign in
/ 8 hours ago
Lisa Baird seems aware that she has a plethora of pressing tasks ahead as...
/ 2 days ago
A year ago, Paige Nielsen was thinking about quitting soccer altogether. She was at...
/ 3 days ago
When Mark Parsons said at the 2020 National Women’s Soccer League College Draft that...