Wambach scores No. 153 in 200th cap, US downs Scotland

Jeff Kassouf February 14, 2013 43
Abby Wambach

Abby Wambach scored her 153rd career international goal in her 200th US appearance on Wednesday. (Photo copyright Kathleen Olmstead for EqualizerSoccer.com)

The United States women’s national team defeated Scotland 3-1 on Wednesday at LP Field in Nashville, Tenn. Abby Wambach scored her 153rd international in her 200th US cap to move within five goals of Mia Hamm’s all-time record.

Wambach scored the US’ second goal of the match in the 51st minute on a diving header from a Sydney Leroux cross. Megan Rapinoe gave the US a lead in the 21st minute with an outside of the right foot shot from 15 yards that curled inside of the far post.

Forward Christen Press replaced Wambach in the 61st minute and made an immediate impact, scoring three minutes after checking into the game. Press settled a through pass from Shannon Boxx and calmly slotted it into the net for her third career US goal in two games. Press started Saturday’s match vs. Scotland and scored twice in her senior team debut.

Scotland’s Suzanne Grant, playing in her 100th match for her country, scored in the 81st minute to spoil the US shutout.

Defender Crystal Dunn, the 2012 MAC Hermann Trophy winner and 2012 U-20 Women’s World Cup champion, earned her first cap with the US senior team. She checked in for Ali Krieger in the 69th minute.

Forward Alex Morgan did not suit up for the game as a precautionary measure after twisting her left ankle on Saturday.

-U.S. Women’s National Team Match Report-

Match: U.S. Women’s National Team vs. Scotland
Date: Feb. 13, 2013
Competition: International Friendly
Venue: LP Field; Nashville, Tenn.
Kickoff: 7 p.m. CT
Attendance: 14,224
Weather: 43 degrees, cold, clear

Scoring Summary: 1 2 F
USA                             1 2 3
SCO                             0 1 1

USA – Megan Rapinoe                                             21st minute
USA – Abby Wambach (Sydney Leroux)                   51
USA – Christen Press (Shannon Boxx)                      64
SCO – Suzanne Grant (Emma Mitchell)                     81

Lineups:
USA: 1-Hope Solo; 11-Ali Krieger (27-Crystal Dunn, 69), 28-Whitney Engen, 19-Rachel Buehler, 5-Kelley O’Hara (Lori Lindsey, 85), 9-Heather O’Reilly, 7-Shannon Boxx (10-Carli Lloyd, 67), 12-Lauren Cheney, 15-Megan Rapinoe, 14-Sydney Leroux (17-Tobin Heath, 81), 20-Abby Wambach (capt.) (22-Christen Press, 61)
Substitutions Not Used: 3-Christie Rampone, 21-Jill Loyden
Head coach: Tom Sermanni

SCO: 1-Gemma Fay (capt.) (12-Shannon Lynn, 46); 2-Rhonda Jones, 10-Jennifer Beattie (17-Frankie Brown, 56), 4-Elish McSorley, 3-Rachael Small; 14-Leanne Crichton (18-Emma Mitchell, 66), 5-Leanne Ross, 7-Hayley Lauder (15-Joelle Murray, 78), 8-Kim Little, 13-Jane Ross9- (Suzanne Malone, 89), 6-Joanne Love (11-Suzanne Grant, 76)
Substitutions Not Used: 16-Lisa Evans
Head coach: Anna Signeul

Stats Summary: USA / SCO
Shots: 19 / 7
Shots on Goal: 10 / 1
Saves: 0 / 6
Corner Kicks: 6 / 4
Fouls: 7 / 7
Offside: 3 / 2

Misconduct Summary:
None

Officials:
Referee: Katja Koroleva (USA)
Assistant Referee 1: Felisha Mariscal (USA)
Assistant Referee 2: Kathryn Nesbitt (USA)
Fourth Official: Maggie Short (USA)

  • Kernel Thai

    Nice to see Whitney Engen get a start. Sermanni seems to the kind of coach who believes in his players and takes responsibility that if they r on his team they can do the job. Very refreshing.

    • Steglitz49

      Ms Engen cut her teeth with Tyresö, Ms Press’s new club. Now Whitney plays for Liverpool so, hopefully, she’ll never walk alone. Meanwhile, there is Amber Brooks and no doubt many others waiting in the proverbial wings. Roll on the Algarve!

  • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

    Good for Grant scoring, but it seemed like Hope was asleep at the wheel on that goal.

    I understand it… No shots on goal until that moment and it gets boring but…

    I was all for Hope becoming the starter during that huge mess back than, but during the next 2 years with no Olympics or World Cup I seriously think it’s time to find the new starter for the US.

    • http://twitter.com/hercircumstance hercircumstance

      You do realize our backline was a new mix and on that play the cross wasn’t challenged nor was the striker closely guarded. It was a mistake by the defense that wouldn’t be made had they been used to playing together. Hope was just the last one holding the rope. It’s a friendly where we payed a lot of new players. Things won’t look perfect. Besides it was a really good goal. Those happen.

      • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

        Yes it was a friendly, but we don’t play games with any mindset short of crushing the competition. Maybe that mindset will change under Sermanni, but I don’t think there is a indication either way yet.

        Beyond that the shot was good, but being good isn’t going to win you games. As good as the shot was it was a floater all day long. Had Hope been paying attention she should have been able to stop it. The only valid (and very valid) excuse would be that she is playing injured, but she has been playing injured for a months so that doesn’t really help her.

        But this isn’t a one game position. I’ve wanted to see what else we have at our disposal since before the Olympics. I’m not saying Hope shouldn’t be our starter in major games, but she isn’t exactly young my personal position is that if you have a significantly younger player that is even almost as good as your starter you go with the younger player. But I would love to see women’s soccer have the same age limit that men’s soccer does sooner rather than later.

        This isn’t an attack specifically on Hope. It’s simply my mindset in general and Hope is completely on the wrong side of it (potentially).

        • http://twitter.com/hercircumstance hercircumstance

          It wasn’t a floater. It was a strong cross that was redirected off her boot away from the direction Hope was leaning. Poor man defending was the crime there from a rookie and a player who should have known better. I can wave it off since it was a new defense and this was an experimental game.

          Hope isn’t old for a goalkeeper and she isn’t like any other goalkeeper on top of that. There is a race for first backup position that is still sorting itself out, but beyond that we are set. Should Timmy Howard be sung off because he is 33 and let in a goal against an island nation or is it ok to analyse the whole context play for him? Never mind. I don’t even like this conversation. I have a feeling people wanting Hope gone who use weak excuses are likely wanting her gone for other reasons. Ain’t nobody got time for that.

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            Oh please. I love her personality. I already told you why I think we need to explore our options.

            Really it doesn’t much matter if it was a floater or not. She didn’t move. You can talk about poor defending all you want (and you probably are right), but that doesn’t change the fact that Hope blew it.

            It’s okay. You don’t have to agree, but you are all over the place. First it was the defenses fault. Than that the shot was good. Now it’s that she was out of position. And now you want to say it wasn’t a floater.

            I’m not petty. Especially when it comes to winning championships. If Hope is the best she should be starting. She should also be open to her spot being challenged. So should you. At no point did I say she wasn’t the best. I would say she is complacent though.

          • necron99

            I dont understand the comment ” She should also be open to her spot being challenged.” She has no say in the matter. That is purely up to the coach. If the coach didn’t try to find and play the best keeper they failed at their job. The inference that she doesn’t want to be challenged and has the power to keep herself from being challenged is ridiculous. One thing that is the truth is that she has been our best keeper for 5 years now. Even in the inside the lines videos she looks like the best keeper.
            I am sick of the conspiracy theories. Abby tells Pia who to play, Abby won’t let any coach sub her out of a game, Hope won’t allow her status to be challenged. Bleh.

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            You are simply taking this the wrong way. I want them to win games just like anyone else here.

            You have to remember that Sermanni was primarily brought in for two things. To win games, but also to discover the talent that previously has been ignored. This assumption that the best people are playing at each position is one I don’t think Sermanni, or US Soccer are comfortable with.

            Your welcome to make a final comment, but we are both steadfast, so I’m not going to waste your time anymore.

          • Steglitz49

            “to discover the talent that previously has been ignored”
            – I put it to you that with an Olympic gold immediately, achieved without La Cannonieressa who was out with a broken leg, followed up by reaching the World Cup final where the US players could not score their penalties and their goalie only saved one, and then winning the Olympic gold again, Mr Sermanni has his work cut out for him.

            It could be argued that Helmut Schoen trumped his mentor in terms of NT success, but Herberger’s team won the Wonder of Bern (where Schoen was an assistant to him, admittedly), which is what matters. The Kaiser, Derwall and Voeller only managed the NT for one world cup each. The Kaiser’s team won and Derwall’s and Voeller’s each brought home a silver. Klinsmann’s and Loew’s teams so far have reached the SF (Loew was Klinsmann’s assistant).

            It is tough at the top of the greasy pole.

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            It can be tough at the top, but I don’t think we have ever given up on a coach, or if we have it’s not common. Our coaches leave because they want to do other things.

            A very dangerous mindset is the one you are suggesting. Just because you win the majority of the games and the gold medals and championships doesn’t mean you have fielding the best team at your disposal. Giving other people chances is not the same as giving up on what you have.

            I don’t understand why I’m getting so much backlash, and being treated like I have no idea what I’m talking about. The fact is what I’m talking about is exactly what is happening – Granted this course of events shouldn’t shock anyone, but it’s not like my philosophy is some absurd idea that no one in their right mind would entertain. Really I think it’s a pretty basic concept that many teams across most sports use.

          • Steglitz49

            Pia Sundhage promoted 4 young players. She also gave a few more their chances. For the major matches she went with what she thought was best.

            It is easy to forget how exceptionally talented the Japanese team that won the World cup was. (How Hope got the golden gloves is beyond me but that is FIFA for you.)

            Add to that the emotional incentive of the Japanese ladies — their country thrashed by an earthquake, a tsunami and a nuclear catastrophe. They were bringing that cup home. Period. The parallels with Bern 1954 are obvious. It is not the lionesses in the fight but the fight in the lionesses.

            Let’s see what happens in Algarve. It is not so long till then. By all expectations Sasaki is bringing a young team. What Germany and the Nordic countries do is not clear.

        • necron99

          If the player is almost as good as go for the younger player? I am glad you are not the coach. If being young had intrinsic value than the younger player would be “better” not almost as good as. If you don’t play your best players with the best chemistry you are making a mistake.

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            Younger players are almost always going to become better. Do you think the Packers went with Rodgers over Favre because Rogers was the better QB??? At some point you have to transition.

          • necron99

            Almost always are going to become better.. but are not better yet. The point of women’s soccer is to win now.. ie the current tournament. You don’t spend a WWC or Olympic year retooling and accepting that you are going to lose. Which you can do in the NFL or MLB because the point is to make money from season ticket holders who will always come out, especially in Green Bay. Farve was on an obvious decline given his state of play. Hope Solo is still saving the USWNT defense’s bacon.

          • Steglitz49

            The USA is unfortunate in that apart from the World Cup it does not have a major serious tournament at NT level (the last time the Olympic gold cut any ice in soccer was 1948). The advantage is that it gives the manager 3 years in which to experiment.

            The NFL and MLB must be compared with the national leagues, where manager have to experiment all the time. The seasons are grueling. There is the league, the domestic cup and either the CL (for some) or Europa cup (for a few others). If things go badly in the league you are relegated. Only the wealthiest teams can survive relegation, and only for a season, max two.

            Wealthy clubs like Man Utd, Real and Barca and a few others, can buy in the transfer market almost at will but most clubs have players bought off them and they have to bring up new players. Occasionally a player has an Indian Summer like Zlatan towards the end of his career, but it is rare.

            I do not understand why the USA defense seems so weak. Is it the same reason as why Brazil does not have good goalies — that everyone wants to be a field-player and preferably a striker?

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            Ya. Favre was clearly on the way down. Never mind he lead a extremely young team (youngest if I remember) to the NFC championship the previous year, and 2 years later went back again with a different team in the same conference.

            Of course you don’t retool during a World Cup or Olympic year. I’m not advocating that. Frankly I’m not even advocating a retooling. What I’m advocating is looking at options in a non World Cup/Olympic year.

            The GK position is a bit more complicated than any other, but what you are advocating is not bringing Abby Wambach in until Mia Hamm retired. I’m sorry but that’s absurd.

        • Steglitz49

          The injury to Alex Morgan may have had some impact on how the game was played. The two coaches might have agreed between themselves to talk to their players about avoiding injuries. Any quality referee would have spoken with the two captains before the match.

          This does not mean that the match was not competitive but that it was played in a comradely spirit of mutual trust, to use a euphemism.

          As regards the age of top ladies’ footballers, I think your wish will come true sooner rather than later. Once pro-soccer is stable, some ladies will step off the train at about 25 and the rest around 27-28 with only handful continuing beyond 30.

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            I should point out the reason I want younger players is two fold. Primarly because the men’s side as the age limit, but also because a younger team is less prone to many issue that simply come with age (the most obvious being risk for injury).

          • Steglitz49

            Given the strength of the NCAA and the strength in depth in the USA in general, soon it will be very rare for a college-aged player to play for the WNT. In other countries, which do not have such a fabulous varsity sports system (thank you, Teddy with the eponymous bear), the players come up through the clubs. Even so, it is rare today to play for the senior NT before 18 and most are 20 by the time they do.

            Much research has gone into the sort of weight-bearing pivoting injuries in contact sports that women suffer more often than men. A fifteen minutes special exercise program to strengthen around the knee-joint seems to make a big difference. Coaches must be made to drill their charges in such exercises. Nevertheless, girls aged <18 years should not play senior team soccer; some would argue that 20 would be an even better cut-off.

          • http://www.phasedma.com Anthony

            I wasn’t aware of this. No age limit however still seems like an attempt to keep the great players for as long as you possibly can.

            The flip side would be to remove the age limit on the men’s side. Perhaps that’s a better position to have?

          • Steglitz49

            Last year the British Medical Journal (BMJ) published an article – “Prevention of acute knee injuries in adolescent female football players: cluster randomised controlled trial” – that showed that a 15-min specially designed exercise program much reduced the risk of knee injuries for girls.

            A lot of research by the NCAA and other sports organisations tries to reduce injuries. Alpine skiing is another sport where knee injuries are a risk, in spite of the release bindings.

            The FAs must assertively insist that coaches and other staff drill young ladies in these simple exercises. Hopefully even better programs can be developed. As far as I know, no national FA has an age-limit for playing at senior level. Maybe they should?

  • Steglitz49

    Now we are going to have to call Abby ”La Cannonieressa” because with a score rate of 153/200 (0.77) goals/match she has matched “Il Cannoiere” Nordahl’s record for his professional career in Serie A (225/291).

    Let’s see how the opening season in NWSL goes for various players. Nordahl scored 16 goals in his first 15 matches in Serie A (he played half a season) and the next year he scored 35 goals in his first full season to set the record. Go Abby and “baby Horse”! Score a ton. Both of you can do it; the crowd can help.

  • NYRick

    Did the game not get more exciting the moment Christen Press entered? The girl can flat out play. She has tremendous patience and poise when she finishes. Almost even better than Alex. But forget the goal for a second (which BTW was a tremendous play by Boxx to set it up). The back heel blind pass in the box to HAO to almost get another goal was as a good a play as you’ll ever see in the women’s game. Marta would have blushed at the sight of that.

    This team can toy with 95% of their competition. We all know that. There are really two teams in a big spot that can beat them (Germany and Japan). Brazil, France, Sweden and Canada can be competitive but they would need their best games vs. the US average game to win (i.e. something like Canada in the Olympic semi). With that said, Press MUST be on the field for 90 minutes in Algarve should they face Japan or Germany in the final. She’s that good. A true game changer. How Pia didn’t see this, along with taking forever to insert Alex as a starter is truly beyond belief. The good news is that I think Sermanni understands. Pia had her favorites.

    • Steglitz49

      In the 2011 WC Sweden defeated the USA in their group game. Japan then beat Sweden in their SF and went on to become World Champions. The Japanese scored their penalties bar one, while the USA failed with 3. That abyssmal failure can hardly be laid at Pia’s door.

      Women’s soccer in Brazil is grossly underfunded. Remember that a young Marta left Brazil and went to Umeå to play. The teams move money from the women’s divisions to their men’s divisions at the drop of a hat. UEFA is struggling with that in Europe because they have found that money they give to poorer member countries to develop their women’s game simply is diverted into their men’s game.

      If Brazil put a fraction more into their ladies’ game they would be awesome. The Brazil brand-name is still strong in soccer, as witness the attendances at their matches in the last Olympics.

      • NYRick

        We can easily get in these underfunded countries etc. argument all the time. It is what it is. For that matter, US men’s soccer (or futbol) was at a disadvantage of a hundred year or so head start by the Euro and S.Americans nations. We’re only dealing with the now, and right now there are only 2 teams who can possibly beat the US women in a big spot. And that grows more distant by the day.

        The US Women are a far more powerful team right now than they were in 2011. Alex Morgan (the best women’s player in the world) changed that equation drastically. I still haven’t (along with many other US soccer fans) figured out what took Pia so long to insert her as a starter. She’s a rare talent and needed to play immediately. It was criminal that she was only being used as a supersub. I hope the same fate doesn’t lay ahead for Press. She needs to play (as in 90 minutes) right now. She’s that good. A far more developed game than Leroux at this stage in my opinion too.

        • Steglitz49

          You would not be so sanguine about underfunding if FIFA was giving the USA millions to support ladies’ soccer and US soccer just passed all of it to the MLS.

          Your point about strong countries is well taken and the SF of the WC and Olympics show interesting patterns. In each of the 6 WCs, the SFs have been contested by 3 large and 1 small (<10m inhabitants) country (always either Norway or Sweden). In the first 3 OGs, it was the same pattern (and same small countries) but in the last 2 OGs it was 4 large countries only. In 2008 Japan reached the SF and in 2012 the final; in 2011 they reached the top in becoming world champions. A meteoric rise. Neither in 2011 nor 2012 did Brazil make the SFs.

          It is difficult to ignore that both size and funding matter but without adequate funds you are stuffed. Those funds can be part of a strong high school and varisty sports program, which helps explain why USA (and Canada) have done so well.

          The 2015 WC will be interesting because Sylvia Neid (WC 2007) is likely to be managing Germany, Sasaki (current WC, OG silver) Japan, Pia Sundhage (2 OG golds, WC runner-up) Sweden and Sermanni USA (the dominant country in ladies' football for the past 25 years). It will be interesting to see whether Herdman can trump Sermanni on home turf, or whether another dark horse can walk off with the silver-ware. Who could that nag be? South-Korea, China, Mexico, or Norway?

          • NYRick

            All good points.

            But the US is the strongest in women’s soccer for 3 main reasons:

            1. Title IX in US school systems: this is a huge advantage over every other country. Without it, the US would be on the level of say Canada or France most likely.

            2. US college soccer system is the “minor leagues” or main
            recruiting/breeding ground for not only top US players, and even US lesser college players who can’t make the US team migrate to their parents country of ethnicity (i.e. their grandmother was born there, hence they can play for Costa Rica etc.).

            It also should be noted the US college soccer system does not work for the men. By 21/22, top players are already competing from other countries in La Liga, the EPL and the Bundesliga and Serie A.

            3. US women athletes play ONE sport: soccer for the most part. Hence, the age old argument of why US soccer does draw our top athletes. Many times, not all, our top stud athletes migrate to the American big 3 (football, baseball and basketball). It’s a cultural thing and just the way it is.

          • Steglitz49

            The population of USA is 315m with a GDP/person of $50k. This compares with 200m and $12k in Brazil, 145m and $36k in Japan and Germany at 81m and $39k. The USA is big and rich.

            I suspect that soon countries with populations <10m will not feature at the top level of women's world soccer, except possibly Norway who seem to put equal effort into ladies' sports as men's as witness their ladies' success in many sports. This speaks to your first point (Title IX).

            Teddy Roosevelt has a lot to answer for. He set up the NCAA, he promoted the National Parks and gave children the world over a cuddly toy, often handed down generation to generation like a Patek Philippe watch. OK, Teddy picked up a Nobel peace prize somewhere along the line too, and fought against corruption.

            Jack Charlton introduced the concept that as along as your grandmother had kept an Irish wolfhound you were eligible to play for Ireland. It is self-evident, that from a country like USA with such strength in depth a smart young lady will try to find an FA of another country who will receive her into their ranks.

            If the development of more money going into the ladies' game continues in Europe and Japan, the USA & Canadian college system will no longer cut the mustard for the ladies. Ms Sawa was 23 when she went to USA to play professionally. Mrs Ogimi was the same age when she went to Potsdam and Ms Kumagai was 20 when she signed for Frankfurt. Marta was 18 when she joined Umeå.

            Finally, your point about one single sport dominating is well taken. In Europe young ladies do not only soccer but also competitive skiing — alpine, cross-country and biathlon (ski-shooting) — and also handball and, in the British isles, cricket. Tennis and golf are, of course, world-wide.

            In this arena Title IX is a wonderful law. One can see how behind the scenes in France and the UK, the government is putting pressure on men's clubs to support the girls, but you can also take Sweden as a warning example. There was a country with by ladies' football big attendances and a booming league, but the Swedish FA neglected them and the league is hanging on for grim death in spite of decent success of its NT. Brrr!

        • Don B.

          Hi, Rick,

          I too wondered why Pia waited so long to put Morgan into a starting position, but I’ve given it some thought and am at rest with her decision. In the grand scheme of things, the only time I actually regret she took so long (and it was a big one) was the WC final. I think we all know that if Morgan had been on the pitch the first half, the entire complexion of the game (and the outcome) would have been much different. That said, I can see also why Pia did what she did even though I don’t necessarily agree with it.

          Abby addressed the issue in a presser before the Costa Rica celebration game last year. She pointed out that Alex at Cal, like her when she played at Florida, was the “go to” person on the team. In other words, they were the ones that had to deal with the responsibility of a game plan consisting of “Well, get Alex (or Abby) the ball and they’ll take it from there.” Abby said Pia had told her to work with Alex, but not to give her too much information and to let her figure it out. Even though Alex had, as a high school senior, more assists than goals (which she led the team in), and at Cal had 45 goals and 17 assists, Pia seemed to think that she still didn’t have a good sense of the game in total and needed to develop better vision and chemistry. That may have been true, but I think Pia underestimated how quickly Alex has been able to learn and develop due to her dedication to the game and her pure raw talent.

          It was also frustrating to Tony DiCicco, who coached Alex in U20 and saw her talents first hand in Chile. He knew what he had, and I’m sure lobbied hard for her to get the full call up. It was after all he who told Alex to expect a call. I don’t think it hurt either that Pia was a guest on the bench for the U20 WC final against N. Korea and was jumping up and down fist pumping when Alex scored that amazing goal. Tony has flat out said that he felt Pia was missing the mark completely with her reluctance to start Alex, and gave a good laundry list of why she should.

          All in all, it may have strengthened Morgan in a positive way to wait. It made her hungrier, and gave her time to develop a solid chemistry with Wambach, as well as being able to anticipate other players and expand her vision of the game – a game that is much faster and more complicated than what she knew in college.

          You’re right, Rick, she’s a prodigy and a once in a generation player. How many others are there who didn’t begin playing serious ball until age 14, who then had national eyes looking in their direction at age 17? As her mother said in a pre-Olympic interview, Alex has seized every opportunity afforded her and made the most of it. We’ll never know what might have been had Pia put her in the starting XI sooner, but we do know that Alex has certainly seized her chance and has made herself into one of the best, if not the best, strikers in the world in a very short time. And the scary part? As Abby said prior to the FIFA awards this year, “She’s just starting to realize her true potential.”

          • NYRick

            Hi Don,

            Thanks for your insight and background info into a great talent. As you know, we are both in agreement, Alex is a special player. She just possesses so many intangibles that can’t be taught. They’re inborn and instinctive, and she maintains a ferocious competitive drive during every game I see her play. On initial appearances based on her looks, one can easily stereotype her as a potential prom queen out there. The funny thing is that she is the complete opposite of that in style and spirit. I made this mistake the first time I saw her play, but immediately sensed she had major game and an odd toughness about her.

            She’s also easily the best natural finisher I’ve ever seen in the women’s game. During the Olympic semi with Canada, I just knew she would deliver the winner. I was thinking around the 88th minute. Surprised it took to the 123rd. I remember watching the game with a few friends and saying please let the ball find her in the end. She will deliver. That’s what special players do. It is not luck, and it is no accident (same thing with the WC final and a myriad of other big goals she has gotten in her young career). I often look at the top women players and try to give them a counterpart to a male soccer star. For instance, maybe Marta can be Messi. For Alex, the easy one is to say she’s Cristiano. But I think she’s more of a deadly mix of Robin van Persie (arguably the most skilled and best striker in the world) and Theo Walcott (blazing pace that has to be accounted for at all times). Whatever she is, I’m glad she plays for the US, and is ours. Abby speaks so glowingly of her for two reasons; she knows she’s just at the tip of the iceberg of her potential, and in her heart of hearts, knows that she’s never seen anything quite like her.

            Your Pia explanation is sound and reasonable, but in reality we both know it still defies proper logic and smarts. Once in a lifetime player: put her on the field. Case closed. She’ll quickly figure it out.

            As for Press, I really like her. She’s not quite Alex, but I think she too possesses special qualities. Together, they would be the greatest tandem in women’s history in my opinion. Even better than Alex and Abby. The blind, back heel pass Press made last game in the box to almost set up a goal was the play only a great player could make. Not to rag on Pia, but this girl not being, at worst, on the final Olympic roster of 18, not just an alternate, is flat out criminal. She was robbed a gold medal. There is no excuse for that. You’ll see. Press is going to be special too. Paired with Alex, it will be downright unfair. I used to think Leroux would be the one with Alex. Now the better choice I feel is Press. Her game is better developed for such a young player and she just has that something that can’t be defined. Much like AM.

          • Don B.

            I too would love to see Morgan and Press work together to become an unstoppable force. They both have great insight, vision, finishing and most important, instinct. If they are ever given the opportunity to develop the chemistry the world is in for a real treat.

            I agree too that Press could very well usurp Leroux as the heir apparent when Abby is fazed out. I really haven’t seen Press play that much, but from what I have seen, she has great potential as one who could do what Alex is so good at; creating impossible goals from nothing either as a scorer or a server. Sid is strong, fast and can put the ball in the net, but I don’t recall at the moment ever seeing her being especially creative on the pitch. Press also seems to have the killer instinct that Morgan displays. Sid doesn’t seem to have that same fire. I say that because, as I mentioned in a previous post, when Pia put her in for the OG semi against Canada, she disappeared. The US went into a 3-4-3 to attack with Alex, Abby and Syd, and yet she did very little to create a scoring opportunity.

            I would love to attend a match with these three (Leroux, Morgan and Press) playing significant time, I like to focus on a single player for a stretch, to watch what they do away from the ball; how they move, how they anticipate, and how they see what’s going on around them. To see how they create. That is most telling.

          • Steglitz49

            It is easy to forget that the USA won the OG SF.

            OK, the Canadians did not have an Iwashimizu to handle Alex, but then Japan are World Champions and Olympic silver-medalists.

            Ms Press went to play for Göteborg, the team in which a young Hope Solo spent a season. Christen has been a great success in Gbg, which with her help has collected quite some silver-ware. She took them all the way to the CL QF, where they are due to play the weaker of the French team. By all accounts, Christen was much loved in the football-capital of Sweden. Her manager was one of the “boys of 82″. *

            Ms Press will now play for Tyresö, a team she helped beat for Gbg to take the Swedish cup (2nd year in a row). Her CL run is over for now. Tyresö has qualified themselves for next season’s CL. As one of Tyresö’s experienced strikers has joined ARod on the side-lines, Christen will have every chance to do well. Tyresö has much more money than Gbg.

            *) The “boys of 82″ are held in quite some affection in Sweden. They were the last semi-professional (almost amateur) men’s club team to win a major European trophy in 1982, when against all expectations they beat Hamburg. (Gbg also won in 1987.) They also did well in the early days of the CL. Today that is not possible — and the ladies’ game is rapidly going that way.

          • NYRick

            Thanks for the info on Christen. I’m just curious on how you know so much about the Swedish league, and also the Japan national team as well. Do you live in either place?

            Glad to see Christen doing so well in Sweden, but as an American soccer fan, I really prefer she returns to the states to help build the new NWSL. Maybe next season. As her status grows with the USWNT, I think that would be the best career move for her and for US endorsements as well. Young US soccer playing girls need to grow up seeing our most talented players such as Press and Morgan play in the US. It’s important to the national team’s development.

            Also, if you know, can you just ballpark what an average attendance is at the Swedish women’s league games, and the the French women’s league games. You can even cite important matches etc. I’m just curious because I’m wondering on what type of crowds are needed to sustain the NWSL and how the Euro leagues survive in their economic model.

          • Steglitz49

            There are more than enough excellent American players so if Christen prefers to play in Sweden let her – Marta liked it so much that she returned for a second sentence (a bit further south in the inhabited part this time). With so much talent in USA it is important that the ladies can go abroad to open up space for those below while at the same time feel safe that they will not be discriminated against for place in the NT.

            There is a lot of information of the WSU site. At least three if not more keen Japanese write in regularly, and also several people in Europe though not Germany. Maybe there is an active German site that satisfies their needs?

            There are also various websites with information (in the local lingo but fairly easy to navigate. For Germany and Sweden you have: —

            http://www.weltfussball.de/zuschauer/frauen-bundesliga-2011-2012/1/
            http://svenskfotboll.se/damallsvenskan/tidigare-ar/resultat-2012/statistikligor/?scr=spl
            – but there are web-sites for almost all the bigger leagues. Search the web! The “Commander” should be able to tell you about the French D1 Féminine. I think attendance is very poor.

            The problem with the statistics is that they present the figures for the means when they should be working with medians and inter-quartile ranges. Briefly, one well- or badly-attended match skews the mean while the median is not so much affected. In the Swedish ladies league, the overall mean attendance last season was 836 while the median was 563. Christen’s old club, Gbg, mean home attendance was 588 while the median was 382 (they had one atypically well attended home match) and for her new club, Tyresö, their mean home was 1951 but the median 2173.

            All women’s soccer in Europe is subsidized. You cannot go by attendances. For example, last year Bayern Munich averaged 534 per match and this year so far they are at 279. The CL match between Arsenal and Potsdam at home in London had about 500 watching. PSG spent lots of money on advertising their home tie against Lyon, paying for billboards all over Paris – 1000 came. At the moment the top German sides Potsdam and Frankfurt manage about 2000 spectators per home game.

            There are no firm figures for the ladies’ teams budgets but it is said that last year the salary budget for Lyon was $3.75m possibly $4m, while Potsdam and Frankfurt were about $2-2.5m each and PSG’s is not known but likely about $3m. What Arsenal and Liverpool put to their ladies is not known but Man Utd closed their women’s section, as almost did Chelsea.

          • NYRick

            Still want Christen playing her club soccer in the US. Sorry :–)

          • Steglitz49

            To each their own. Rebecca Moros is having a whale of a time in Japan, as is Beverly. I would have thought Japan would be more interesting. A totally different culture and the experience would make you more unusual and therefore more marketable when you return to the US.

          • Steglitz49

            Seeing that you are into the Sweden ladies’ soccer scene, you might be amused to learn about the latest debate in the media. Briefly, it has become known that the Swedish men’s NT, who have achieved nothing of note for 10 years and some would say more than 18 years, actually are paid quite well with generous bonuses, while the ladies’ NT which has been quite successful is paid virtually nothing.

            According to the media, the TV-audience for the ladies’ WC final of 2003 which Sweden lost n a golden goal was watched by an estimated 3.8m, that is 40% of the population. It sounds on the high side, but only events like the Crown-princess wedding and the Eurovision song contest get that sort of TV viewing figures (ie 3m+).

            Swedes have become used to sports like alpine and cross-country skiing an biathlon (ski-shooting) having equal prize-money for the sexes. Thus, the disparity between the little that the comparatively successful ladies earn and the amounts the pretty inept men earn is the more glaring. The Japanese ladies have had the same experience, as we discussed.

            Do you know if there are any figures for MLS salaries vs NWSL salaries? And USA’s MNT vs WNT?

          • NYRick

            Interesting stuff on the disparity between the mens and women’s salaries, but not surprising at all. It also should be noted that Sweden used to be quite dominant in men’s tennis from the mid 70s to early 90s or so (Borg, Wilander, Stefan Edberg) and that sport has disappeared off their radar. I wonder why? In fact, Borg famously moved to Monaco to avoid the heavy Swedish tax on his winnings.

            As for MLS salaries, Foxsoccer.com had an a good report on that a couple of months ago. The average MLS salary was surprisingly in the low high 30s to low 40K. I could be wrong here, but that seems absurdly low for a US professional men’s league. I would guess decent players to be making at least 75 to 100K. Of course, the designated players for each team like Beckham and Henry were making around 5 mil a year, but the median average was ridiculously low when you remove their salaries from the average. As for the WNT, I heard that each team member received around a 90K bonus for winning gold. As for their salaries, I would imagine Morgan and Abby to be making good money, but I really have no idea. As you know, all USWNT members playing in the NWSL have their salaries subsized by their soccer federations. Same holds true for Canadian and Mexican players.

          • Steglitz49

            Speaking of tennis, the oddity was that Sweden never produced a top-class lady while there was a string of men. Sweden has had plenty of women taking Olympic and WC gold in various sports, but tennis is a white patch of the sporting map. Many Swedish top sports people move to Monaco for tax-reasons (incl Stenmark and Pärson) while some of the tennis players preferred London.

            When the Japanese ladies won the WC, allegedly their federation had no plans of paying them any bonuses (or, at the most $250) so the Kirin brewery stepped in and paid them $10k each (no doubt a lot of beer was sold that night and the next day). The federation eventually paid them something. The Nadeshiko earn next to nothing, considerably less than the men and even much less than the U-23 men.

            In Europe most women who play soccer earn nothing of note. This is true for all the leagues. A very few in the wealthy leagues earn reasonably but even in those leagues most play for love of the game. To improve the situation, attendances must go up.

            It is an odd phenomenon that men aged 20-35 in all countries are willing to pay quite a lot of money to watch 3rd rate men’s soccer while women will not go and watch top-class women’s soccer. If women were loyal to their sisters and went and sat in the stands, even if they spent the 90 minutes knitting, the stands would be full and the ladies’ game take off. Why women who love to play soccer cannot convince other women to help them is another strange phenomenon. Maybe the NWSL will.

            Maybe Jeff could start a column about what the readers of the Equalizer thinks women soccer players ought to be able to earn?

          • NYRick

            Great point on Swedish women’s tennis players. I can’t ever recall one of note.

            Also, terrific insight on the attendance of women fans at women’s soccer games. For the most part in the US, you’ll see the large contingent of young soccer playing girls (ages 10-14) with their moms and dads at the matches. I would say, more dads, who don’t need their arm pulled to go so Alex Morgan. The rest seem to be high school and college aged guys (also the Morgan factor in my opinion). You’re right, if young women in that 20-35 range supported the sport more, it might take off even more. Right now, most fans will come out to see the USWNT team. As a whole, they are extremely popular, get kind of rock star treatment at times, have a variety of unique personalities on the team, and are routinely drawing 15-20K a match for their friendlies and tribute tour. With that said, I still think Alex has a lot to do with those high numbers.

            But the NWSL is going to be an interesting experiment once all the “stars” are now divided up. Even with salaries subsidized, I think attendance at matches will make or break the league eventually. Obviously, all Morgan matches will sell very well. I hate to put it that way, but it’s just the way it is. In the states, men view her more as a sex symbol than a soccer star. The games that don’t have Morgan can’t get away with (in my opinion) having 2K at the gate and have the league survive. We’ll see. I’m hoping it works, but it is going to be a work in progress.

          • Steglitz49

            I agree with you that attendances of 2000 per match will not be enough in USA. Judging by the rest of the world, you cannot make money out of ladies’ football. All the leagues and teams around the world are subsidized.

            Apparently, 2800 turned up in France in Tours to watch PSG slaughter the home side 6-0 in the Cup tie. That is quite some record considering that only 1000 showed up in Paris when PSG played Lyon, in spite of an ad campaign! It could be that French ladies’ soccer has turned a corner — Ms Horan, Heath and Asllani, not forgetting the French stars in PSG, no doubt have some pulling power.

            But, USA does not have a domestic cup competition — yet.

            Assume 11 home games in a season, 6000 per game and a ticket price of $30, and you get $2m before costs and taxes. On the other hand, if you truly can get an average attendance of 6000 per game, maybe you can get $1m in sponsorship?

            As for Alex being a sex symbol, judging by the video of the France-Germany match, the French WNT seems to play in form-hugging outfits this year, though it could be a mirage of wearing warmer (ie thicker) underwear on the night. The “Commander” was unable to offer an opinion as to whether a haute couture house had designed the strip.

          • NYRick

            I think you hit the nail on the head about Syd. Obviously, she’s shown great promise already at a young age, and does have a penchant for putting the ball in the net. But she was invisible in that Canada semi, which was the most important spot of her career to date. It was either her nerves because it was Canada or the moment was too big for her, but it was a mediocre performance when they needed her most.

            Even though she’s being viewed as a major talent, there is something incomplete about her game. I understand that she is young and it may develop. But sometimes those things just don’t. She kind of reminds me of ManU’s Danny Welback. So much pace and talent, yet there’s an out of control element to his game that may never be fixed. Call it poise for a lack of better word. Although as a ManU fan, he scored a great goal this week against Madrid and played a terrific match. Maybe he’s ready for a breakthrough.

            Alex and Christen seem to have great poise when given scoring opportunities. That can’t be taught. Regardless of how good an athlete you are. You either have it or you don’t. This is nothing against Syd at all. For all we know, she could very well turn out to be the best of the 3 in the long run. But I would bet that the unstoppable tandem now and into the future for the US will be Press-Morgan. The good news is that I think Sermanni understands. We’ll see.