WPS players push for USSF sanctioning

Jeff Kassouf November 28, 2011 14
Keelin Winters

Keelin Winters (23) just completed her first-ever U.S. national team camp after a strong rookie season with the Boston Breakers. Without WPS, players like Winters may not have any avenue to break into the national team. (Photo Credit: Patricia Giobetti | www.printroom.com/pro/psgiobetti)

Women’s Professional Soccer players realize the implications of the league losing sanctioning from the United States Soccer Federation. Sunday’s introduction of a formal petition means WPS players are getting serious. And so is the situation.

WPS has less than a week to find a sixth team, an ultimatum put forth by the USSF on Nov. 20, when the federation decided to delay a decision on sanctioning the top-flight women’s soccer league until Dec. 5. USSF stipulations require a Division I women’s professional league to have at least eight teams in three different time zones. Currently, WPS has five teams that all play in the Eastern Time Zone.

League officials are hopeful that they can work out a deal to obtain USSF sanctioning with either five or six teams, but it is unclear if the USSF will budge on its demand for a sixth team. Without sanctioning, WPS risks losing its top international players and the very premise the league stands on when it claims it is ‘the best in the world.’

WPS owners have reportedly said they will play even without Division I sanctioning, possibly as a Division II league. But that would mean a league that likely would not feature any U.S. national team players or any top international talent. An unsanctioned league is not recognized by FIFA and in an Olympic year, few players would be willing to test the consequences of playing in such a league. Top players may also hesitate to play in a Division II league.

Western New York Flash president and player Alex Sahlen sent out an email on Sunday asking for electronic signatures on the petition to urge the USSF to sanction WPS. The petition has garnered over 3,600 electronic signatures as of Monday morning, including those of many WPS players.

Becky Sauerbrunn is the first signature listed on the home page of the petition. Sauerbrunn played every minute for the Washington Freedom in 2009 and 2010 before finally missing some time in 2011 with magicJack due to U.S. national team call-ups and the Women’s World Cup. That success with the United States is undoubtedly a direct effect of Sauerbrunn’s stellar play in WPS.

She, along with so many other players (such as U.S. and Philadelphia Indpendence midfielder Lori Lindsey, for example), recognize the importance a professional league has on developing new national team talent. Both find themselves in the national team mix thanks to exceptional play in WPS. As part of the petition reads (unedited) regarding the U.S. World Cup team:

“Every player on the 2011 World Cup Roster has played in the WPS and benefited from the day in day out training and weekly competitive games in what has been up until now, the best women’s soccer league in the world. Some players would have never been in the National Team frame if it weren’t for the WPS. The WPS brought them the exposure and the platform that they needed to push to the forefront and represent their country at the biggest stage in world soccer. Without the support and Division 1 sanctioning of the league, the league will not be able to uphold and retain its Top domestic and National Team players as well as International Stars.”

WPS finds itself with just five teams – an all-time low – after terminating the magicJack franchise in October. It is unlikely that any potential expansion franchise could join WPS for 2012 before the Dec. 5 deadline. Several candidates are said to be ready for 2013 entry, including Connecticut, Detroit, Long Island and a handful of West Coast teams.

The legal battle surrounding magiJack is also a major point of concern for WPS. Beau Dure has more on that, including legal documents surrounding the case.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brian-Black/100002871590786 Dude

    Good, a Petition.
    Signed.

  • stephen

    Since the owners are willing to run the league as a Div. 2 league, instead of petitioning the USSF for sanctioning shouldn’t the players be petitioning for a relaxation of the requirement that the USWNT play Div. 1?

    • Jeff Kassouf

      Honestly, I’m not sure of the specifics of how USWNT and D-2 status fit in, but I don’t see U.S. players in a D-2 league no matter if it’s in writing that they can’t be or not.

  • Chuck

    This is hard for me! I signed the petition but I am not sure it is the right thing. There is no WPS within 1000 miles of me since St. Louis and Chicago went down. I want teams I can watch and teams I can take my teams to and teams my players can aspire to join when they leave college. Now we have an Ivory tower, pie in the sky league that local players can not relate to at all. I would rather have all those resources applied to a widespread league with 10 teams in every state. If owners are going to lose money why not spread that money around and positively impact as many people as possible? 10 teams at 300,000 a year vs 1 team at 3 million sure makes more sense to me! The federation can support the national team and they will get a nice bump in registration/league/licensing fees if there are all these new teams playing!
    One of the biggest benefits to me would be the possibility of actually having a system where national team scouts can go see players in every state playing with and against the best to make sure we actually see the right players for the national team instead of the narrow view we get from looking just at D1 college players.

    Tough call! I want the best for the players but I also want the best for the game!

  • Ashley

    Fill me in more – why will national team players and other top talent not play for an unsanctioned or Division II league? What does it mean when you say ‘few players would be willing to test the consequences of playing in such a league’ – what consequences would those be?
    So basically if WPS fails, top players would be left with either, play in a league below your skill level and have your growth as a player stunted or, hope that you’re good enough to somehow make the national team or an international club. What a dismal outlook. On the west coast, with all the money people have to throw around and the top quality soccer, I’m stunned as to why it’s so hard to develop a couple more teams there.
    I was at the USWNT game in Phoenix (because I live in Idaho and it would be one of my only chances to see that level of soccer, thanks to no WPS teams), and people would support west coast soccer.

  • Chris

    Someone educate me! I have yet to see an article anywhere explaining sanctioning. What does this mean? What exactly are the repercussions for the league NOT being sanctioned. Does US Soccer give them money? If no…who cares? So it operates as a Division II league….and? If 100% of the players continue to play, what they can’t join the Oluympic team? Are you kidding me? So US Soccer is going to “unsanction” the ONLY Division I Womens league inside the US? They are in the business of shooting themselves? I am remembering an episode of the TV show “Cheers” when Woody Harrelsons character complains he hasn’t been given a raise. He goes in the office to argue with the boss played by Kristie Allie. He comes out and Ted Danzen asks if he got a raise. He says No, but now I am Head Bartender. Ted says, that’s not right, and goes in the office and comes out to procliam he is now Chief Bartender. Is that all we are talking about here are lables but nothing else effectively changing here? This seems silly. Sorry but I am not getting the IMPORTANCE of this “sanctioning” lables.

  • http://nathan3e.blogspot.com/ Nathan

    I personally want WPS to succeed but I am having trouble locating any sympathy right now. They seem to have profound difficulty even getting the minutiae right. Example: “League” was not spelled correctly on their Lowdown column on the official website. I contacted the writer. Now it is misspelled in a different way. What a way to run a railroad. And did anyone not know that magicJack would be a disaster? To be taken seriously, they need to lose the Amateur Hour feel immediately – there are UK non-league clubs that present themselves with more professionalism.

  • Jeff Kassouf

    An unsanctioned league just will not work. It won’t be recognized by USSF or FIFA. Here are the bylaws: http://www.ussoccer.com/about/governance/bylaws.aspx They are a bit vague, but Bylaw 103 tells us “The Federation and its members” – including leagues – “are…obliged to respect statutes, regulations, directives and decisions of FIFA and of CONCACAF…” There can’t be an unsanctioned league. Think about it: Children can’t even play in a league beyond rec. soccer without registering and getting a player pass. It’s all under USSF, which is under FIFA’s umbrella.

    Now, the implications of playing as a D-2 league? Those are unclear even to me. But I don’t see top talent being retained in that situation. Plus, I see no point in sanctioning a D-2 league when they already exist. Either sanction it as D-1 or not at all, which I believe was suggested earlier in this thread.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brian-Black/100002871590786 Dude

    Hey Jeff,
    What is the USSF’s main hangup/motivation in regards to not granting a waiver for WPS for another year?
    (an Olympic year, no less)

    • Jeff Kassouf

      I honestly don’t know. USSF isn’t commenting on the matter right now.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brian-Black/100002871590786 Dude

    And by the way, I just noticed that…of the 17 members on the USSF board, only 2 are women…

    I wonder how that plays into this decision?

  • WNTfan

    ESPN has an FAQ on the sanction.
    http://espn.go.com/espnw/more-sports/7291705/answering-tough-questions-wps

    Please everyone write and call US Soccer.

    Even if there isn’t a team near you, if we can keep the league alive, someday it can expand. If the league folds, all the players are either unemployed or they move to Europe.

    This could destroy development of the next generation of players. Don’t let this happen.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brian-Black/100002871590786 Dude

      Agreed!

      Forcing WPS to stay with mj is a bit like forcing someone to stay in a Bad Marriage.
      If WPS folds, then it folds, but it shouldn’t be because the USSF wouldn’t grant any leeway on the rules.
      Especially in an Olympic year.